The MasterBlog: Global Economy -G20 Pledges stir uneasy sense of déjà vu
Subscribe to The MasterBlog in a Reader Subscribe to The MasterBlog by Email

MasterBlogs Headlines

Monday, November 15, 2010

Global Economy -G20 Pledges stir uneasy sense of déjà vu

Pledges stir uneasy sense of déjà vu

By Chris Giles, Christian Oliver and Alan Beattie in Seoul

Published: November 12 2010 17:58 | Last updated: November 12 2010 17:58

World leaders have tried to reduce trade imbalances many times since failing to agree on a comprehensive framework at the 1944 Bretton Woods conference.

In recent years, before the global economic crisis, the efforts were marked by the 2006 multilateral consultations run by the International Monetary Fund and, after the crisis, by the 2009 Pittsburgh G20 summit, where nations pledged to “promote more balan­­ced current accounts ... to advance global prosperity and growth sustainability”.
More FT video

In the “Seoul action plan” on Friday, only the language was different. The G20 again pledged to “strengthen multilateral co-operation to promote external sustainability and pursue the full range of policies conducive to reducing excessive imbalances”.

Every time world leaders have made such statements, they have run into the insurmountable problem that they have not simultaneously been able to agree specific policies to achieve their ambitions, nor a timetable, nor an enforcement mechanism if anyone does not play ball.

Seoul was the same. Nevertheless, G20 leaders ex­pressed the conviction that this time would be different. Barack Obama, the US president, said: “Step by step, what we’re doing is building stronger international mechanisms and institutions that will help stabilise the economy.”

David Cameron, the British prime minister, said: “The key thing is, [the global trade imbalance] is being discussed in a proper multilateral way without resort to tit-for-tat measures and selfish policies.”

But their cause for optimism about the process is undermined by the similarities between current negotiations and past failures.

Agreeing measurable targets is almost impossible. Before the Seoul summit, China and Germany re­jected specific targets for current accounts – just as other groups of countries refused in 2009 to sign up to specific stimulus targets.

As a compromise, the vague notion of “indicative guidelines” on current accounts was set to usher in a year of squabbling about the right indicators.

Angela Merkel, the German chancellor, showed the process would not be easy when she said “a number of indicators” would need to be used, and finance ministers would discuss them “in detail” next year. Dominique Strauss-Kahn, the IMF’s managing director, went further.

“They all said they were going to do it, but I can hear in their voices that this is going to be one more [source of] trouble,” he said.

Using the IMF as an arbiter or referee, as one US official suggested in Seoul, also fills Mr Strauss-Kahn with a sense of déjà vu. He predicted the fund would end up as the “bad guys” when it became the body pushing for co-ordination.

The underlying problem is that it is impossible to force nations to agree when they have irreconcilable differences over their global economic analysis and policy prescriptions.

As the US official admitted: “There is no country that is going to be willing to cede sovereignty of its basic economic policies to a committee or to an independent agency.”

Prof Eswar Prasad of Cornell University in New York said: “[This summit] has rendered the G20 goal of strong, sustainable and balanced growth into a meaningless mantra with little follow-through of policies.”

That sort of damning assessment has not stopped the optimistic President Nicolas Sarkozy of France from saying that his G20 chairmanship next year will aim to build a “more stable and more resistant” global currency system to attack imbalances.

“When France first spoke about a new Bretton Woods – I remember I spoke about this for the first time at the United Nations two years ago – we were seen as oddballs,” said Mr Sarkozy.

“Today, the whole G20 and the rest of the world reckons that we should look at improving the inter­national currency system.”

He added: “With [China’s] participation, it is a huge step forward. No one denies there’s a problem.”

Most economic experts have more limited ambitions and greater concerns. “The global economic recovery is proceeding on twin tracks. The discordant outcome of this summit poses the real risk that we could be in for a train wreck,” said Prof Prasad.

Additional reporting by Alan Beattie / Global Economy - Pledges stir uneasy sense of déjà vu

Share this|
________________________ The MasterBlog

No comments:

Post a Comment

Commented on The MasterBlog

Tags, Categories

news United States Venezuela Finance Money Latin America Oil Current Affairs Middle East Commodities Capitalism Chavez International Relations Israel Gold Economics NT Democracy China Politics Credit Hedge Funds Banks Europe Metals Asia Palestinians Miscellaneous Stocks Dollar Mining ForEx Corruption obama Iran UK Terrorism Africa Demographics UN Government Living Bailout Military Russia Debt Tech Islam Switzerland Philosophy Judaica Science Housing PDVSA Revolution USA War petroleo Scams articles Fed Education France Canada Security Travel central_banks OPEC Castro Nuclear freedom Colombia EU Energy Mining Stocks Diplomacy bonds India drugs Anti-Semitism Arabs populism Saudi Arabia Brazil Environment Irak Syria elections Art Cuba Food Goldman Sachs Afghanistan Anti-Israel Hamas Lebanon Silver Trade copper Egypt Hizbollah Madoff Ponzi Warren Buffett press Aviation BP Euro FARC Gaza Honduras Japan Music SEC Smuggling Turkey humor socialism trading Che Guevara Freddie Mac Geneve IMF Spain currencies violence wikileaks Agriculture Bolívar ETF Restaurants Satire communism computers derivatives Al-Qaida Bubble FT Greece Libya NY PIIGS Republicans Sarkozy Space Sports BRIC CITGO DRC Flotilla Germany Globovision Google Health Inflation Law Mexico Muslim Brotherhood Nazis Pensions Peru Uranium cnbc crime cyberattack fannieMae pakistan stratfor Apollo 11 Autos BBC Bernanke CIA Chile Climate change Congo Democrats EIA Haiti Holocaust IFTTT ISIS Jordan Labor M+A New York OAS Philanthropy Shell South Africa Tufts UN Watch Ukraine bitly carbon earthquake facebook racism twitter Atom BHP Beijing Business CERN CVG CapitalMarkets Congress Curaçao ECB EPA ETA Ecuador Entebbe Florida Gulf oil spill Harvard Hezbollah Human Rights ICC Kenya L'Oréal Large Hadron Collider MasterBlog Morocco Mugabe Nobel Panama Paulson RIO SWF Shiites Stats Sunnis Sweden TARP Tunisia UNHRC Uganda VC Water Yen apple berksire hathaway blogs bush elderly hft iPad journalism mavi marmara nationalization psycology sex spy taxes yuan ALCASA ANC Airbus Amazon Ariel Sharon Australia Batista Bettencourt Big Bang Big Mac Bill Gates Bin Laden Blackstone Blogger Boeing COMEX Capriles Charlie Hebdo Clinton Cocoa DSK Desalination Durban EADS Ecopetrol Elkann Entrepreneur FIAT FTSE Fannie Freddie Funds GE Hayek Helicopters Higgs Boson Hitler Huntsman Ice Cream Intel Izarra KKR Keynes Khodorskovsky Krugman LBO LSE Lex Mac Malawi Maps MasterCharts MasterFeeds MasterLiving MasterMetals MasterTech Microsoft Miliband Monarchy Moon Mossad NYSE Namibia Nestle OWS OccupyWallStreet Oman PPP Pemex Perry Philippines Post Office Private Equity Property Putin QE Rio de Janeiro Rwanda Sephardim Shimon Peres Stuxnet TMX Tennis UAV UNESCO VALE Volcker WTC WWII Wimbledon World Bank World Cup ZIRP Zapatero airlines babies citibank culture ethics foreclosures happiness history iPhone infrastructure internet jobs kissinger lahde laptops lawyers leadership lithium markets miami microfinance pharmaceuticals real estate religion startup stock exchanges strippers subprime taliban temasek ubs universities weddimg zerohedge

Subscribe via email

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner