The MasterBlog: trading
Subscribe to The MasterBlog in a Reader Subscribe to The MasterBlog by Email

MasterBlogs Headlines

Showing posts with label trading. Show all posts
Showing posts with label trading. Show all posts

Wednesday, September 21, 2011

Grantham: ‘No market for young men’

Sept. 21, 2011, 12:01 a.m. EDT

Grantham: ‘No market for young men’

Market veteran blasts income inequality, buys blue-chip stocks

By Jonathan Burton, MarketWatch
SAN FRANCISCO (MarketWatch) — Hey, Young Turks on trading desks, up-and-coming money managers and Wall Street stock jockeys: You want the truth about the global markets today?
Listen to Jeremy Grantham, chairman of Boston-based investment manager GMO LLC: You can’t handle the truth.
“This is no market for young men,” Grantham said. “At least us old men remember what a real bear market is like, and the young men haven’t got a clue.”
Women, too, for that matter. And at 72, after 40-plus years in the investment business, Grantham can make this claim unchallenged, but his point is more about the lessons of experience than the limitations of age, and an investor’s ability to build on the former and overcome the latter.
With Greece on the verge of default, and economic growth in even the healthiest developed markets stuck in slow gear, Grantham reserves his harshest words for the leaders of central banks, big money-center banks and governments. The fittest global companies, meanwhile, are getting his firm’s client’s money.
Policymakers and politicians have acted like “children at play,” Grantham has said. As he sees it, they’ve created a tower of debt and an illusion of wealth, and have not been held responsible for their frivolous actions.
“No one has been prepared to make tough decisions,” Grantham said in a recent telephone interview. “Where have the Europeans been for 10 years? None of these things came out of the woodwork two weeks ago. No one attempted to blow the whistle and make tough decisions in a timely fashion.”

Targeting income inequality

“Kicking the can” on deficits and spending delays the reckoning, but only makes it more painful when it comes. Had “grown-ups” been supervising the financial system, the problem might not have gotten out of hand, Grantham noted.
To put the debt crisis in perspective, Grantham suggested imagining multiple stacks of building blocks, “fairly precarious and fairly tall,” each set uncomfortably close to the other. If one falls, it could either take down several others or fall neatly between them. The trouble, Grantham said, is that there’s really no way to know.
Financial markets nowadays are faced with this hit-or-miss scenario, and buyers don’t like the odds. Said Grantham: “We have these basically distinct problems joined only by a general fragility of the financial system. So you can’t know for sure that if China stumbled it wouldn’t set off something else, or if the U.S. goes into a double-dip [recession], it won’t set off a European bank failure.”
Especially worrisome to Grantham is the gulf between wage earners in the U.S. The top 10% of U.S. workers currently receive about half of the nation’s total income, with half of that going to the top 1%. The last time this country saw a wage gap so extreme was just before the 1929 stock-market crash and the Great Depression. By comparison, in the late 1970s the top 1% garnered about 9% of all earnings.
“You can’t run the economy on BMWs alone,” Grantham said. “If the average person is in a pickle, how do you have a healthy economy?”
For starters, he said, you tax the richest more than they’re paying now. Said Grantham: “We have actually made the tax structure friendlier to the top 10%.”
Grantham contends that income inequality at these levels takes a real toll on ordinary workers and society as a whole. To bridge this gap and give average workers a bigger slice of the pie, Grantham advocates investing in education, training, and to “change the tax structure to make it equitable.”

Value stocks, rich market

Grantham also doesn’t approve of Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke taking steps that he said essentially have put savers in a box. Keeping interest rates low, and stating that rates will remain in the cellar for at least a couple of years, forces people to take more risk with their money if they want yield and capital appreciation.
“You’re transferring money away from retirees” who must either delve into stocks, gold or some other higher-stakes investment, or languish in savings accounts and low-yielding bonds, Grantham said. “They could use that money. They would spend every penny.”
Instead, Grantham said the Fed’s policy puts money “in the hands of people who aren’t spending it — people who only buy BMWs and don’t support Wal-Mart.” This creates a vicious cycle in which, Grantham said, individual savers are penalized and restrain spending, while the beneficiaries are “bankers and corporations that can build factories all over the place — except they won’t because consumption is too weak.”
Accordingly, Grantham sees this path coming to no good end over the short-term. He said he expects another leg down for the U.S. stock market, one where shares could stay low-priced for years while U.S. economic growth plods along at maybe 2% annually instead of the relatively more robust historical average of around 3.4%.
But Grantham is an investor, not a politician, so his job is to hunt down opportunities in bull or bear markets. Nowadays, he’s finding more stocks that fit GMO’s strict value-investing discipline.
“If we adjust earnings to normal and apply an average P/E, you can finally build a decent portfolio today of global equities at a respectable long-term return,” he said.
The potential for gains is “modestly higher” outside of the U.S., he added, other than “high-quality blue-chips.” Mostly, he said he prefers discounted plays that are surfacing in Europe and emerging markets.
“In stocks you will eventually do OK at these prices,” Grantham said.
“The real danger is one or two of these building blocks falling over,” Grantham said. “You can buy a whole portfolio of slightly cheap global stocks, and the risk you take is that you get sandbagged by some of these major problems.”
Indeed, Grantham said that since there’s a “decent chance” of stocks becoming even cheaper, GMO is positioned slightly below normal in equities “because the risk profile of the world is way over normal.”
At the same time, he’s not jumping on the long-term-bond bandwagon. “One day we will have more inflation and our bonds will bleed like a pig,” Grantham said. “The only reason for buying long bonds is short-term or as a desperate haven for terrorized investors. But the potential to make longer-term real money is naught.”
Grantham runs a personal, non-profit foundation dedicated to the protection of the environment. For the foundation he has invested heavily in agriculture, commodities and natural resources. Timber is a favorite, as are fertilizer companies. He’s not a big fan of gold. “I own some myself as a pure speculation,” Grantham said — “just enough to mute the irritation of watching gold [prices] rise.”
For others, Grantham advised taking a page from GMO and buying shares in companies with strong finances and which produce goods that people need, as opposed to luxury items. Look for dividend-paying opportunities in emerging markets especially. “I would own emerging and EAFE (the MSCI Europe, Australasia, and Far East Index), including Japan,” Grantham said.
“In the end everything comes down to value, and they have suffered a lot more recently,” he said of non-U.S. markets. “Yes, it can get whacked in the next 18 months if the wheels come off, and the possibilities are likely, but if you hang in anyway you’ll make a respectable return.”

Copyright © 2011 MarketWatch, Inc. All rights reserved.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
Intraday Data provided by SIX Telekurs and subject to terms of use. Historical and current end-of-day data provided by SIX Telekurs. Intraday data delayed per exchange requirements. Dow Jones Indexes (SM) from Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All quotes are in local exchange time. Real time last sale data provided by NASDAQ. More information on NASDAQ traded symbols and their current financial status. Intraday data delayed 15 minutes for Nasdaq, and 20 minutes for other exchanges. Dow Jones IndexesSM from Dow Jones & Company, Inc. SEHK intraday data is provided by SIX Telekurs and is at least 60-minutes delayed. All quotes are in local exchange time.
Grantham: ‘No market for young men’ - Jonathan Burton's Life Savings - MarketWatch


Friday, December 10, 2010

ETFs On Pace To Top $1 Trillion Asset Mark In Early Q1

Report: ETFs On Pace To Top $1 Trillion Asset Mark In Early Q1

By Murray Coleman

Assets in U.S.-based ETFs are rising at a pace that should cross the $1 trillion mark sometime in the first quarter of 2011, says market tracker Strategic Insight.

At the end of November, U.S. ETF assets stood at a record $940.5 billion, estimates analystLoren Fox in a note to clients today.

Driven by strong contributions from investors into stock funds, U.S.-based ETFs had $7.2 billion inflow during November, according to the firm.

Meanwhile, bond ETFs had net outflows.

"Roughly 84% of ETF assets are in equity ETFs, so any improvement in investor confidence that increases demand for equities will propel ETF flows and assets," Fox adds.

While not providing any specific fund breakdown, a report by the National Stock Exchange on Dec. 3 listed Vanguard Emerging Markets ETF(VWO) as particularly popular in November. (The NSX data is by far the most fresh and comprehensive on ETFs so far.)

Also, flows in funds such as iShares Silver(SLV), iShares MSCI Germany (EWG) and theMaterials Select Sector SPDR (XLB) came to light earlier through a report by Birinyi Associates.


Sunday, October 3, 2010

The MasterFeeds: On Tomorrow's Secret Meeting To Plot The End Of Hi...

On Tomorrow's Secret Meeting To Plot The End Of High Frequency Trading
The MasterFeeds: On Tomorrow's Secret Meeting To Plot The End Of Hi...

Share
-- The MasterFeeds

Wednesday, September 15, 2010

The MasterFeeds: Market Still Deluding Itself That It Can Escape The Inevitable Dénouement


By Albert Edwards, Société Générale, London 

The current situation reminds me of mid 2007. Investors then were content to stick their heads into very deep sand and ignore the fact that The Great Unwind had clearly begun. But in August and September 2007, even though the wheels were clearly falling off the global economy, the S&P still managed to rally 15%! The recent reaction to data suggests the market is in a similar deluded state of mind. Yet again, equity investors refuse to accept they are now locked in a Vulcan death grip and are about to fall unconscious.

The notion that the equity market predicts anything has always struck me as ludicrous. In the 25 years I have been following the markets it seems clear to me that the equity market reacts to events rather than pre-empting them. We know from the Japanese Ice Age and indeed from the US 1930's experience, that in a post-bubble world the equity market merely follows the economic cycle. So to steal a march on the market, one should follow the leading indicators closely. These are variously pointing either to a hard landing or, at best, a decisive slowdown. In my view we are poised to slide back into another global recession: the data is slowing sharply but, just like Japan in its Ice Age, most still touchingly believe we are soft-landing. But before driving off a cliff to a hard (crash?) landing we might feel reassured when we pass a sign that reads Soft Landing and we can kid ourselves all is well

Read the rest of the story here  >  > >

Share this|
________________________

Saturday, September 11, 2010

Is U.S. Debt Junk? - or is it CNBC

this is the CNBC video of Erin Burnett's spat with Michael Pento of Euro Pacific Capital on the merits of US Treasuries.

Looks like someone doesn't like it when you poke a hole in their fantasy world...

The best part of the video, however, is not that.

It is when the other guest, Joseph Balestrino of Federated Investors, says:
"Nothing is in a bubble when people want to buy it.."!!!  
Go tell that to the guys that were buying the NASDAQ/loading up on tech stocks  in January 2000 or (and, as they were probably the same old fools) buying/flipping homes in California, Florida, etc during 2007!!

Airtime: Tues. Sept. 7 2010 | :40:0 10 ET



Is U.S. Debt Junk? - CNBC.com

Share this|
________________________

Monday, August 9, 2010

Goldman Sachs Lost Money on 10 Days in Second Quarter - Bloomberg

Goldman Sachs Lost Money on 10 Days in Second Quarter

Goldman Sachs Group Inc., the bank that makes the most revenue trading stocks and bonds, lost money in that business on 10 days in the second quarter, ending a three-month streak of loss-free days at the start of the year.

Losses on Goldman Sachs’s trading desks exceeded $100 million on three days during the period that ended on June 30, according to a filingtoday by the New York-based company with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. The firm also disclosed that trading losses surpassed its value-at-risk estimate, a measure of potential losses, on two days.

Trading results across Wall Street firms declined after Goldman Sachs and its biggest rivals posted perfect results, with no losing days, in the first quarter. Goldman Sachs’s $5.61 billion in second-quarter trading revenue exceeded all of its Wall Street competitors. The bank, overseen by Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Lloyd Blankfein, relied on trading for 71 percent of its revenue in the first half of the year, down from 80 percent a year earlier.

Today’s filing also shows that the firm’s traders generated more than $100 million on 17 days during the quarter. Of the 65 days in the quarter, Goldman Sachs traders made money on 55 days, or 85 percent of the time.

Morgan Stanley said separately today it lost money on 11 days during the second quarter. The losses never exceeded $75 million daily, and never surpassed the firm’s value-at-risk estimate. Morgan Stanley’s traders made more than $175 million on one day, the firm said in an SEC filing today.

Goldman Sachs agreed last month to pay $550 million to settle a fraud lawsuit filed by the SEC over Goldman Sachs’s 2007 sale of a mortgage-linked investment. In the settlement, a record for the SEC and a Wall Street firm, Goldman Sachs said it made a “mistake” by failing to disclose that a hedge fund that helped construct the investment was also planning to bet against it.

To contact the reporter on this story: Christine Harper in New York at charper@bloomberg.net


Goldman Sachs Lost Money on 10 Days in Second Quarter - Bloomberg

________________________

Wednesday, August 4, 2010

All 96 Cent Currencies go to a Dollar

Subject: All 96 Cent Currencies go to a Dollar
 Bruce Krasting
Looking at the FX screen today you have to conclude: The dollar is weak. Oh the pain. How many big names have stuck their heads out and said that the strong dollar bet was the trade of the year.

It is tempting to look at this and conclude:
"The market got way ahead of itself back in June when the EURDLR broke 1.20. What we are seeing today is slo-mo reversal of all of those long dollar positions that were put on in the first half of the year. On a pure comparison basis it is hard to get excited about buying Euros, it is even less exciting to get long the Yen at these historic levels. Each area has its own set of problems. Anyone who thinks that the EU's problems are behind it is just wrong. We are just having a pause in the action."

Alternatively it is quite possible that the issues facing the US will overwhelm sentiment and position taking. That would be my best guess for the month of August. Being short Euros might look compelling, but it is a risky trade.The market is not positioned for that reality

What might the factors be that influence the outcome?

There is not going to be a crisis in the EU for the next 2-3 months. They have a lid on things.  A crisis could evolve in Europe if the bond markets unravel (again). If spreads widen and CDS is again a topic in the papers then the dollar would be in demand. But that is unlikely to happen with the EU defense mechanisms in place. They have mega billions available to buy bonds. They have been able to contain the crisis with a modest amount of intervention. Shorting Spanish bonds is no longer a sure winner. There is a big carry cost to being short. There is two-way risk. The world is "short" yield today. There seems to be a limitless demand for fixed income paper. This will pass at some point. But not for the foreseeable future.

There is a slow motion crisis evolving for the dollar in my view. There is a lack of viable options for the US. There are a number of possible outcomes:

A) The Fed and The Administration continue to pour on the gas. (QE-2 from Ben and a hefty $500b spending package AKA "the Krugman" option)

B) We could go to December 1st when the fiscal commission confirms what we already know (we are about 4-5 years away from an explosion) and a credible plan is put forward to increase taxes and reduce expenses.

C) We do essentially nothing on monetary or fiscal policy.

If we get A it will surely be bad for the dollar across the board. It would imply that there would be a financial penalty for owning dollars; our deficit would rise to over 10% of GDP. Where's the beef for owning the buck in that scenario?

If we get B it will be in the form of, "We are going to tighten our belts, but not now. It would aggravate unemployment so we are going to get serious about our budget, but not until 2013." Kiss of death for the dollar.

Some form of C is most likely. We continue with ZIRP as we now know it (with minor tweakage). No major new fiscal approaches are undertaken. The benefits of the 09 ARRA stimulus will fade. Some taxes will be raised. Dividends, capital gains and incomes over $250,000 will be taxed at higher levels. On paper the deficits will look smaller as a result (6-7% at best). But this will kill the economy. In this scenario long-term growth will fall to sub 1%. As that happens the deficits will explode on their own. Who wants dollars if this happens?

The FX markets rule the roost. Central banks can only watch and hope that things turn out as they wish. The Japanese and Swiss CBs tried to contain the fx market. They failed. In the midst of the EU chaos the ECB did not intervene. They knew their presence would just have attracted more sellers. It has been quite a few years now that the Fed has stuck its toes in the intervention waters. But that does not mean we should ignore what the CBs and Treasury types are signaling. I see evidence that the major European countries are moving in a direction that would be friendly to their currencies. The US is going down a decidedly different path. According to the WSJ's Jon Hilsenrath, QE-2 (Lite) will be announced next week. He gets his thoughts straight from Ben B., so the cards are being dealt.

Bernanke has a Bloomberg. He knows exactly where the EURDLR is trading. He is whooping for joy today. He wants a weak dollar more than anyone in the world. He is praying for inflation at this point. A weaker dollar is very helpful in achieving that. So when you weigh the sides of this, and if you're looking to place a bet, always keep in mind that there is no one who has a hand on the levers that wants a strong dollar. They all want it weak.

We are seeing this play out already. Look at crude. Why is it breaking out? I think the dollar is driving it. I ask the question, What possible benefit could this bring to the US economy? Inventory profits for big oil is a good plan? Lining the pockets of those we import oil from helps America?  But it will make inflation go up, and headline inflation is what the Fed wants to see. We'll just be poorer as a result.

The line "All 96 cent currencies go to par" was a reference to the Swiss Franc. It is currently worth 96.25 cents (1.0389). In my many years of watching this silliness I have observed that most things that get to 96 do go to 100. We shall see.

View article...

Saturday, July 31, 2010

"It's Not A Market, It's An HFT 'Crop Circle' Crime Scene" - Further Evidence Of Quote Stuffing Manipulation By HFT | zero hedge

High Frequency Trading - HFT - OR THE SCAM IN THE MARKET....


"It's Not A Market, It's An HFT 'Crop Circle' Crime Scene" 

- Further Evidence Of Quote Stuffing Manipulation By HFT


"It's Not A Market, It's An HFT 'Crop Circle' Crime Scene" - Further Evidence Of Quote Stuffing Manipulation By HFT | zero hedge

________________________

Tags, Categories

news United States Venezuela Finance Money Latin America Oil Current Affairs Middle East Commodities Capitalism Chavez International Relations Israel Gold Economics NT Democracy China Politics Credit Hedge Funds Banks Europe Metals Asia Palestinians Miscellaneous Stocks Dollar Mining Corruption ForEx obama Iran UK Terrorism Africa Demographics UN Government Living Russia Bailout Military Debt Tech Islam Switzerland Philosophy Judaica Science Housing PDVSA Revolution USA War petroleo Scams articles Fed Education France Canada Security Travel central_banks OPEC Castro Colombia Nuclear freedom EU Energy Mining Stocks Diplomacy bonds India drugs Anti-Semitism Arabs populism Brazil Saudi Arabia Environment Irak Syria elections Art Cuba Food Goldman Sachs Afghanistan Anti-Israel Hamas Lebanon Silver Trade copper Egypt Hizbollah Madoff Ponzi Warren Buffett press Aviation BP Euro FARC Gaza Honduras Japan Music SEC Smuggling Turkey humor socialism trading Che Guevara Freddie Mac Geneve IMF Spain currencies violence wikileaks Agriculture Bolívar ETF Restaurants Satire communism computers derivatives Al-Qaida Bubble FT Greece Libya Mexico NY PIIGS Peru Republicans Sarkozy Space Sports stratfor BRIC CITGO DRC Flotilla Germany Globovision Google Health Inflation Law Muslim Brotherhood Nazis Pensions Uranium cnbc crime cyberattack fannieMae pakistan Apollo 11 Autos BBC Bernanke CIA Chile Climate change Congo Democrats EIA Haiti Holocaust IFTTT ISIS Jordan Labor M+A New York OAS Philanthropy Shell South Africa Tufts UN Watch Ukraine bitly carbon earthquake facebook racism twitter Atom BHP Beijing Business CERN CVG CapitalMarkets Congress Curaçao ECB EPA ETA Ecuador Entebbe Florida Gulf oil spill Harvard Hezbollah Human Rights ICC Kenya L'Oréal Large Hadron Collider MasterBlog MasterFeeds Morocco Mugabe Nobel Panama Paulson Putin RIO SWF Shiites Stats Sunnis Sweden TARP Tunisia UNHRC Uganda VC Water Yen apple berksire hathaway blogs bush elderly hft iPad journalism mavi marmara nationalization psycology sex spy taxes yuan ALCASA ANC Airbus Amazon Argentina Ariel Sharon Australia Batista Bettencourt Big Bang Big Mac Bill Gates Bin Laden Blackstone Blogger Boeing COMEX Capriles Charlie Hebdo Clinton Cocoa DSK Desalination Durban EADS Ecopetrol Elkann Entrepreneur FIAT FTSE Fannie Freddie Funds GE Hayek Helicopters Higgs Boson Hitler Huntsman Ice Cream Intel Izarra KKR Keynes Khodorskovsky Krugman LBO LSE Lex Mac Malawi Maps MasterCharts MasterLiving MasterMetals MasterTech Microsoft Miliband Monarchy Moon Mossad NYSE Namibia Nestle OWS OccupyWallStreet Oligarchs Oman PPP Pemex Perry Philippines Post Office Private Equity Property QE Rio de Janeiro Rwanda Sephardim Shimon Peres Stuxnet TMX Tennis UAV UNESCO VALE Volcker WTC WWII Wimbledon World Bank World Cup ZIRP Zapatero airlines babies citibank culture ethics foreclosures happiness history iPhone infrastructure internet jobs kissinger lahde laptops lawyers leadership lithium markets miami microfinance pharmaceuticals real estate religion startup stock exchanges strippers subprime taliban temasek ubs universities weddimg zerohedge

Subscribe via email

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

AddThis

MasterStats